Brief Project Summary:

Thinking about how you define money ask yourself the following:

Can you prove your definition of money logically?
Is your definition common to everyone?
Has any authority published it or its equivalent ?

Fundamental Principles of Law, require that parties to a contract share an unequivocal and valid understanding of the objects of the contract. Therefore and with regards to money contracts, all of us should be able to answer “yes” to all of the above, otherwise there is no way to assure any common understanding as required by law in order for contracts to be considered valid.

We are an expert technical and legal team that on the basis of a broad set of indisputable evidence can prove:

That at all levels, expert or otherwise, there exists no valid common definition of “money” and its function.
The assumption that money can be both a measure of value as well as a tradable commodity is logically inconsistent constituting a misrepresentation of the facts underlying common money contracts.
Without, an unequivocal valid common standard definition of money, comprehensible to all parties, current money contracts can no longer continue to enjoy the status of being valid as has been assumed to date.

We therefore seek:

To inform and disseminate all findings based on the technical and legal research by the MSTA founders and collaborators.
The publication of a valid scientific and legal definition of money and all associated uses and practices that can be understood and accepted by all.
To take all necessary legal measures to prevent all harm or injustice arising from the current void due to money’s current misrepresentation.
To determine any liability for the current misrepresentation of money and seek corresponding redress.